pregnancyweekbyweek.comTM
The most comprehensive weekly pregnancy guide on the webTM

Pregnancy News


Stay up on the latest news about Pregnancy and Childbirth

Morning sickness runs in families

A woman's chances of experiencing severe nausea during pregnancy appear to be influenced, at least in part, by genetics, according to new study findings. Researchers found that women were more likely to experience a serious form of morning sickness if their mothers or sisters did as well.

Research has shown that severe morning sickness is more likely to affect both members of identical twin pairs, hinting at a heritable element.

Most pregnant women - an estimated 75 percent - experience some morning sickness, according to the American Pregnancy Association, but 1 percent suffer the extreme HG form of illness that can require hospitalization.

It's unclear why some women become nauseous while pregnant and others don't. Even animals such as dogs and monkeys appear to experience a form of morning sickness,

There can be variation in nausea and vomiting from one pregnancy to the next, which suggests that not only genes are involved but also other factors. Some studies suggest a female fetus or carrying multiple fetuses results in more nausea. So the level of nausea in pregnancy may be a combination of both genetic factors and non-genetic factors.

HG hospitalizes more than 59,000 women every year in the U.S.and there is no reliable treatment for nausea in early pregnancy. Options include dietary changes (such as eating small meals and avoiding spicy foods), alternative therapies such as acupressure and hypnosis, and some prescription anti-nausea medications.


SOURCE : American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oct. 25, 2010

Eating Peanuts While Pregnant

Peanut allergy is serious, usually persistent, potentially fatal, and appears to be increasing in prevalence.  According to a recent study reported by the National Institutes of Health-NIH, women who eat peanuts during pregnancy may be putting their babies at increased risk for peanut allergy.

U.S. researchers looked at 503 infants, aged 3 months to 15 months, with suspected egg or milk allergies, or with the skin disorder eczema and positive allergy tests to milk or egg. These factors are associated with increased risk of peanut allergy, but none of the infants in the study had been diagnosed with peanut allergy. Blood tests revealed that 140 of the infants had strong sensitivity to peanuts. Mothers' consumption of peanuts during pregnancy was a strong predictor of peanut sensitivity in the infants.


SOURCE: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, news release, Nov. 1, 2010

Naked Celebrities on Magazines

In 1991, Demi Moore made having a baby bump chic when she posed on the cover of Vanity Fair heavily pregnant and nude.


Since then, dozens of famous moms-to-be have struck Moore-like poses with their child in utero. Earlier this year, a very pregnant Claudia Schiffer was photographed by Chanel designer Karl Lagerfeld for German Vogue, and this month Orlando Bloom’s supermodel wife Miranda Kerr took it all off for W magazine at six-and-a-half months pregnant.


Hollybaby Executive Editor Kathy Campbell says these shots are the celeb equivalent of getting a belly cast or creating a lasting memento of their pregnancy.

“I think being pregnant is a very special time in a woman’s life, so why not pose to capture that special moment forever? There are plenty of women who do belly casts, so this is just another way of capturing it. I think it’s beautiful,” Hollybaby Executive Editor Kathy Campbell said.


When Moore first struck her iconic pose, we were a little more prudish. That mag cover was banned from several newsstands and at others was wrapped in paper to avoid offending sensitive eyes. Since Demi, Cindy Crawford, Heidi Klum, Milla Jovovich, Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera have all bared their bellies during their joyous times.

Pregnancy represents a “safe” time for a celebrity to pose nude.

“During pregnancy, the naked body isn’t as sexualized. It is safer to go nude because you’re looking at these women as life-giving vessels rather than sex objects,” explains US Weekly photo editor Peter Grossman.

Yet, in some ways, these nude pregos are setting unfair expectations for the average mama. Regular pregnant women simply don’t look like Miranda Kerr with her shapely belly and well-proportioned everything else. A lot of women are swollen, veiny, bloated and have cottage cheese thighs when they’re pregnant.

And not everyone is a fan of what writer Rebecca Traister once dubbed “pregnancy porn.” Bruce Jenner certainly isn’t. On a recent episode of ‘Keeping up with the Kardashians,’ Bruce was none too pleased when Kris displayed a photo of Kourtney Kardashian imitating Demi’s pose in the couple’s bedroom.

“That’s a nude shot of my daughter Kourtney,” Bruce said. “Why have that in here? Is it art?”

Some women see the pregnancy pictures as simply another outlet for celebs to channel their self-absorption.

“Some of them do it because they are self-selected narcissists who act like they are the first women to ever conceive a child, like its some great feat that nobody else but them are capable of,” says ‘Cult of Celebrity’ author Cooper Lawrence. “Add to that the extraordinary attention we media folk pay to the ‘baby bump.’ We only encourage their delusions of grandeur by making it easy for them to think that their pregnancy is indeed the second coming, so they must be photographed for posterity, for all the world to see, since they are indeed ‘special.’”

One thing is for sure. We won’t be seeing any less of these naked pregnant celebs. As long as they keep selling magazines and getting clicks online, you can be sure someone will keep asking these pregnant stars to take their clothes off.


Originally reported by PopEater.com.